Creator analytics, from the raw numbers up
Profiles, post and video histories with the counts already pulled out — so engagement, cadence and growth are yours to compute rather than somebody else's metric to trust.
What serves this
Read from the platform registry, so nothing here is a job the API cannot currently do. Each endpoint links to its own reference.
Why raw post history beats a computed metric
Every analytics product computes an engagement rate, and no two compute it the same way. Some divide by followers, some by views, some include shares, almost none include saves because they cannot see them. When two tools disagree about a creator, the disagreement is definitional rather than factual — and neither will show you the arithmetic.
Pulling the post history yourself removes the argument. You get every post with its like count, comment count, view count and timestamp, and you compute whatever your business actually means by performance. Cadence, decay, the ratio between a creator's median and their best post — all of it is arithmetic on a table you own.
It also lets you go back. A computed metric is a number about now; a post history is a series, and the interesting questions in creator analytics — is this account growing, has engagement decayed since the sponsorship, is the good post an outlier — are all questions about a series.