ScrapeCreators vs SocialHolmes
ScrapeCreators is a real product and this page says what it is good at. On price alone it is about 3.8× what we charge for the same thousand results.
| SocialHolmes | ScrapeCreators | |
|---|---|---|
| Per 1,000 results | $0.50 | $1.88 |
| Paid before your first call | None | $47.00 |
| Subscription | No | No |
| A run that returns nothing | Costs nothing | Usually billed |
| Free tier | 1,000 credits on sign-up | One-off credits on sign-up |
What ScrapeCreators is better at
ScrapeCreators is well documented, quick to start with, and its no-code and n8n integrations mean somebody who is not a developer can get data out of it the same afternoon. The field coverage per record is generous.
Their changelog moves quickly, which on a scraping product is worth more than most features.
Where SocialHolmes wins
About a third of the rate, and no $47 to begin. Their credit model also charges differently per endpoint, so the effective rate depends on your mix in a way a headline figure does not show.
Credits that never expire, rather than a pack you are working through before it lapses.
Is this comparison fair to ScrapeCreators?
Why are you cheaper than ScrapeCreators?
Can I run both while I decide?
What if I need something you do not cover?
Try it against your own targets
The only comparison that settles this is your own. A new account gets 1,000 credits, needs no card, and runs against the same endpoints and the same rate as a paying one.
Other providers' figures are their own published rates as at August 28, 2026, normalised to dollars per thousand results. They change often — check before you rely on them, and tell us if one is wrong.